🇦🇪UAE

تجاوز التكاليف والنفايات (Cost Overrun - Contract Inefficiency & Waste)

2 verified sources

Definition

ADSB's newbuild and engineering segment generated only AED21.91M gross profit on AED381.56M revenue (5.7% margin). Industry benchmarks for shipbuilding show 8-12% gross margins on Navy newbuild contracts. The margin gap suggests cost overruns and waste. Historical context: ADSB restructured its cost base and disposed of a floating dock to reduce annual costs by AED40M, indicating severe cost control issues.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Estimated 2.3-6.3% margin gap on newbuild contracts = AED8.7M to AED22.9M underutilized gross profit per H1 2025 (annualized: AED17.4M to AED45.8M); disposal of floating dock = AED40M cost reduction target
  • Frequency: Continuous across active contract portfolio
  • Root Cause: Manual compliance defect tracking (rework cycles); Emiratisation quota friction (Nafis mandatory labor quotas increase scheduling complexity and overtime); inefficient change order processing

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Shipbuilding.

Affected Stakeholders

Program Managers, Cost Engineers, Production Scheduling, Quality Assurance, HR/Emiratisation Compliance

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

تأخر تحصيل المستحقات (Time-to-Cash Drag - Contract Revenue Realization)

AED227.033M in operating cash flow decline (H1 2024 vs H1 2025); AED444.9M locked in receivables; estimated working capital cost at 9% UAE Corporate Tax + 5% financing cost = ~AED24.5M annual opportunity cost on idle receivables

غرامات الامتثال الضريبي والتنظيمي (Compliance Penalties - Tax & Regulatory Violations)

Estimated: AED5,000 to AED50,000 per late Corporate Tax filing; AED3,000 to AED15,000 per incorrect VAT return; estimated 0.5-2% of contract value if e-invoicing non-compliance flagged post-Jan 2027 = AED2.5M to AED10M for a AED500M contract

تجاوز مهل الإخطار بمطالبات الضمان وفقدان الحقوق القانونية

AED 2M–10M per vessel incident (based on typical commercial vessel repair costs of AED 500K–5M+ multiplied by frequency of multi-year fleet operations). Manual processing adds AED 50K–200K annual administrative drag per fleet operator.

عدم إنفاذ الضمانات الاحتياطية وخسائر الاسترداد من بناة السفن

AED 20M–100M annual leakage across UAE fleet (estimated 5–15% of pre-delivery installments on active projects = AED 1B–3B total exposure @ 5–15% recovery rate). Per-project: AED 100M contract × 30–40% advance payment = AED 30M–40M at risk per delayed/cancelled project.

عدم الامتثال لمتطلبات الكشف عن العيوب المخفية والغرامات التنظيمية

AED 500K–2M per disputed claim (legal fees AED 100K–500K; arbitration/court costs AED 200K–1M; lost productivity AED 100K–500K). Average fleet (20–50 vessels) experiences 2–5 hidden defect claims per 3-year cycle = AED 1M–10M total compliance cost.

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence