🇦🇺Australia

Non-compliance with AS 1428.1 Signage Standards

4 verified sources

Definition

Failure to meet precise signage specs (tactile height, Braille, contrast) in wayfinding and signage design triggers BCA non-conformance, requiring redesign and potential civil penalties under disability access laws.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: AUD 5,000 - 50,000 per non-compliant project in rework costs; penalties up to AUD 110,000 for accessibility breaches
  • Frequency: Per building/project audit failure
  • Root Cause: Manual verification of complex AS 1428.1 specs (mounting heights, tactile dimensions, Braille grade 1) without design software

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Accessible Architecture firms in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 10,000+ per project on rework and penalties. Automation of compliance checks eliminates this risk.

Affected Stakeholders

Designers, Architects, Signage Fabricators, Building Certifiers

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence