🇦🇺Australia

Payment Service Provider (PSP) Licensing & Registration Gaps

2 verified sources

Definition

New Payment Service Modernisation legislation requires PSPs and major SVF operators to register with APRA (commencing 2026) and comply with mandatory ePayments Code standards. Non-compliance triggers regulatory action, license suspension, or revocation.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: AUD 100,000–300,000 (licensing application costs + compliance systems build + potential audit remediation)
  • Frequency: One-time (at legislation commencement) + ongoing annual compliance
  • Root Cause: Unclear regulatory scope for wire transfer PSPs; gaps in compliance infrastructure; legacy processes not aligned to new SVF/PSP definitions

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Australian fintech and non-bank wire transfer providers waste AUD 100,000–300,000 on reactive compliance remediation and licensing delays. Proactive regulatory mapping and controls automation ensures license readiness.

Affected Stakeholders

Compliance & Legal, Product teams, Risk & Internal Audit, Finance

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence