🇦🇺Australia

Defence Procurement Compliance Failure - Counterfeit Parts Detection System Non-Compliance

3 verified sources

Definition

US DoD enforces mandatory counterfeit parts prevention through DFARS 252.246-7007. Australian contractors supplying defence electronics must establish detection systems including supplier vetting, testing protocols, traceability, and reporting. Non-compliance results in: (1) Contract suspension/termination; (2) Restitution of costs for counterfeit materials already supplied; (3) DCMA Purchasing System Review audit failures; (4) Loss of 'preferred contractor' status; (5) Corrective action plan costs (40-100+ hours management time).

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: AUD 50,000-500,000 per compliance failure (contract suspension, rework, restitution); AUD 10,000-50,000 per failed DCMA audit; 60-150 hours remediation labour @ AUD 150-250/hour = AUD 9,000-37,500
  • Frequency: Annual compliance audits (DCMA reviews); reactive penalties upon counterfeit discovery
  • Root Cause: Inadequate supplier qualification, manual inspection gaps, lack of traceability systems, insufficient personnel training on counterfeit detection requirements

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Australian defence manufacturing firms waste AUD 50,000-500,000+ annually through non-compliant counterfeit detection systems, failed audits, and forced rework of contaminated inventory. Automated traceability and inspection automation eliminates detection failures and associated penalties.

Affected Stakeholders

Procurement Manager, Quality Assurance Engineer, Supply Chain Manager, Compliance Officer, Contract Administrator

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Rework and Scrap Costs from Undetected Counterfeit Parts

AUD 100,000-2,000,000 per counterfeit incident (scrap + rework labour + expedited procurement); 80-200 hours rework labour @ AUD 150-250/hour = AUD 12,000-50,000; Expedited procurement premium: 20-50% markup = AUD 50,000-500,000; Customer delay penalties: AUD 5,000-50,000/day

Poor Supplier Selection and Vetting Decisions - Counterfeit Risk Blindness

AUD 30,000-300,000 per poor supplier decision (penalty, rework, contract loss); 20-40 hours vetting labour @ AUD 150-250/hour = AUD 3,000-10,000; Opportunity cost of contract loss: AUD 50,000-500,000+

Procurement Delays and Cost Escalations

AUD 16-21B allocated over decade with delays risking 10-20% overruns; individual projects like 155mm munitions paused costing millions in sunk tender efforts

Idle Capacity from Compliance Bottlenecks

AUD 5-10M per year in idle equipment for mid-tier firms; targets 15,000 rounds/year delayed to 2028

Export Control Permit Breaches

AUD 100,000+ per breach in fines; 20-40 hours/month in permit delays per project

Compliance Ambiguities & Red Tape

AUD 50,000-150,000 per large project in extended liability and admin costs

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence