RERT Non-Performance Penalties
Definition
Participation in government-backed DR like RERT requires reliable performance; non-delivery due to admin delays results in withheld or clawed-back payments effectively acting as penalties.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 100% forfeiture of event payments (up to $250,000 per single event for large curtailments)
- Frequency: Per failed event activation
- Root Cause: Administrative delays in event notification propagation and execution
Why This Matters
The Pitch: DR administrators in Australia 🇦🇺 risk 100% clawback on $250,000 event payments. Automated response systems ensure full compliance.
Affected Stakeholders
Program Coordinators, Site Operators, Legal/Contracts
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Capacity Loss from Failed Demand Response Events
Delayed Verification and Payment Drag in DR Administration
Incident Response Remediation Costs
Operational Downtime from Cyber Events
Delayed Interconnection Approvals
Excessive Study and Assessment Costs
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence