SAHT Transfer Program Compliance Fines
Definition
CHPs must adhere to strict tenancy transfer rules, including no disadvantage basis for Type 1 tenancies and 90% KPI for new allocations. Failure risks regulatory penalties from Housing SA Authority.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 5,000-20,000 per compliance breach (typical Fair Work/ATO penalty range for housing admin failures)
- Frequency: Per transfer event or audit failure
- Root Cause: Manual handling of complex tenancy types and transfer policies leading to errors
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Housing providers in Australia 🇦🇺 risk AUD 10,000+ fines per violation on Portability Transfer Processing. Automation of tenancy verification and transfer policies eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Community Housing Providers, Tenancy Managers, Housing Authority Staff
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Portability Processing Delays
Transfer Bottleneck Capacity Loss
Non-Compliance Fines in Housing Programs
Audit Documentation Delays
Poor Record-Keeping in Income Reviews
False Statutory Declaration Penalties
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence