Bad Vendor Decisions in D&C Procurement
Definition
D&C procurement shifts excessive responsibility to designers, compromising professional standards and leading to financial losses from disputes or rework.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: 10-20% cost increase from unfair contracts and risk exposure
- Frequency: Common in construction projects using D&C model
- Root Cause: Novated D&C contracts lacking proper due diligence in bidding
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Interior design firms in Australia 🇦🇺 face 10-20% higher costs from D&C risks. Automation of vendor evaluation eliminates poor decisions.
Affected Stakeholders
Architects, Interior Designers, Contractors
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Vendor Selection Cost Overruns
Procurement Auction Price Competition Risks
Budget Tracking Cost Overruns
Delayed Invoicing from Variance Errors
Poor Supplier Decisions from Visibility Gaps
Delayed Client Payments from Milestone Billing Errors
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence