🇦🇺Australia

Overhead Allocation Inefficiencies

2 verified sources

Definition

Regulated utilities and IT operations face strict rules for splitting shared costs like IT maintenance between services, often relying on manual FTE surveys, revenue proxies, or blended methods, leading to time-intensive processes and potential AER rejections.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: 20-40 hours/month manual allocation effort; 7-16% indirect costs misallocated per KPMG report
  • Frequency: Monthly for billing cycles
  • Root Cause: Manual FTE surveys and lack of automated WBS data for shared IT/operations costs

Why This Matters

The Pitch: IT System Operations firms in Australia 🇦🇺 waste 20-40 hours/month on manual cost allocation. Automation of causal allocator calculations eliminates this overhead.

Affected Stakeholders

Finance Managers, IT Operations Leads, Billing Teams

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence