Cost of Poor Performance Quality
Definition
Performance testing mitigates risks of system failure under load, avoiding production issues like slow response times and hardware cramps that demand costly fixes.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: 35-70% excess costs from traditional testing regimes; rework for production failures (AUD hours/penalties)
- Frequency: Post-launch incidents
- Root Cause: Skipped or insufficient load/stress testing
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Australian IT testing companies incur rework costs from unoptimized apps. Comprehensive load testing reduces failure risks upfront.
Affected Stakeholders
Testing Leads, Customer Support
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Capacity Loss from Untested Systems
Cost Overrun in Performance Testing
ISO 27001 Non-Compliance Fines
Compliance Audit Outsourcing Costs
Certification Downtime Bottlenecks
Cost of Poor Quality
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence