Cost of Poor Regression Quality
Definition
Manual testing misses defects in complex scenarios, leading to higher costs of poor quality through rework and lost productivity.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Manual testing costs reduced by up to 80% (est. AUD 200k/year savings)
- Frequency: Post-release defects
- Root Cause: Limited test coverage in manual regression
Why This Matters
The Pitch: IT Evaluation providers in Australia 🇦🇺 incur rework costs from missed regression defects. Automation ensures comprehensive coverage, slashing quality failure expenses.
Affected Stakeholders
Support Teams, Customers, Project Managers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Manual Testing Bottlenecks
Regression Test Delays
ISO 27001 Non-Compliance Fines
Compliance Audit Outsourcing Costs
Certification Downtime Bottlenecks
Cost of Poor Quality
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence