Cost of Poor Quality
Definition
PRAC simplifies recalls but mandates strict reporting; failures trigger penalties, adding to quality failure costs like rework and refunds.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 50,000+ per non-compliance incident (fines, legal action); 20-40 hours per recall event on manual steps
- Frequency: Per recall event, mandatory for all sponsors
- Root Cause: Complex manual processes in legacy URPTG (10 steps reduced to 5 in PRAC), risking delays
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Medical equipment manufacturers in Australia waste AUD 50,000+ per recall event on manual compliance and penalties. Automation of recall notifications and tracking eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Recall Coordinators, Compliance Officers, Sponsors
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
Related Business Risks
Compliance Penalties
Administrative Cost Overrun
Rework from CAPA Delays
TGA CAPA Non-Compliance Fines
Bußgelder wegen verspäteter Meldung von Vorkommnissen an die TGA
Überhöhte interne Kosten für manuelle Bearbeitung von Beschwerden und MDR‑Bewertungen
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence