Pipeline Nomination Cuts
Definition
Manual nomination processes result in cuts due to priority rules, mismatches, or errors, leading to capacity loss and reliance on costly balancing services.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 50,000+ per major cut event (lost throughput at AUD 10/GJ); 5-20% capacity loss per gas day
- Frequency: Daily nomination cycles (Timely, Evening, Intraday)
- Root Cause: Manual data entry, phone/email coordination delays, failure to meet AEMO cut-offs
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Natural Gas Extraction players in Australia 🇦🇺 lose 5-20% of nominated capacity annually due to manual scheduling cuts. Automation of nomination cycles eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Schedulers, Traders, Pipeline Shippers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Unallocated Nomination Volumes
Nomination Record Keeping Failures
Environmental Protection Licence Non-Compliance Fines
NOPSEMA Environment Plan Approval Delays
EIS and Site-Specific EA Application Costs
STTM Deviation Settlement Imbalances
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence