Gap Payments on Non-Bulk Billed Services
Definition
MBS covers 75-85% of schedule fees for many RACF services; gaps arise without bulk billing, leading to lost revenue if facilities subsidize or fail to recover.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: 15-25% gap per service (e.g., $6-10 on $42 GP consult; $20+ on $82 item)
- Frequency: Per non-bulk billed allied health/pathology in RACF
- Root Cause: Failure to meet bulk billing incentives or track concessional patients (MMM 1-7)
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Nursing homes in Australia 🇦🇺 forfeit 15-25% Medicare benefits ($10-20 per service) due to non-bulk billing. Automation flags bulk incentives (10990/10991) to capture full rebates.
Affected Stakeholders
Revenue Cycle Manager, Clinical Billing Officer
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
MBS Billing Non-Compliance Fines
Non-compliance Fines for Care Plan Documentation Failures
Lost Government Subsidies from Documentation Gaps
Staff Time Waste on Manual Care Plan Development
Produktivitätsverlust durch Kommunikationsfehler zwischen Pflege, Küche und Ernährungsberatung
Delayed Discharge Bed Blockage
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence