Umsatzverlust durch ineffiziente Einsatz- und Routenplanung

Definition

Australian field‑service tools for furniture assembly and removalists highlight that digital scheduling, dispatch and GPS tracking allow crews to start directly from home, cut paperwork and unnecessary calls, and fit in additional jobs per day.[2][4] Field‑service providers report that route optimisation and mobile scheduling can save around 2 hours of manual work and travel per day per crew, which can instead be converted into additional billable jobs.[1][4] For office furniture installers charging etwa AUD 100–150 pro Monteurstunde, losing 1–2 billable hours per installer per day because of poor scheduling and excessive dead‑travel translates to roughly AUD 25.000–60.000 Umsatzverlust pro Jahr und Monteur (230 Arbeitstage × 1–2 h × 100–150 AUD). For a typical 10‑person crew this aggregates to AUD 250.000–600.000 theoretischer Umsatz, of which even a conservative 20 % realistically recaptured through better optimisation yields AUD 50.000–120.000 zusätzliche Erlöse pro Jahr.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Office furniture manufacturers and installers in Australia 🇦🇺 waste geschätzt AUD 50.000–120.000 pro Jahr je 10-Mann-Crew durch suboptimale Tourenplanung und manuelle Disposition. Automation of crew scheduling, GPS‑gestützte Routenoptimierung und Auslastungssteuerung recaptures lost billable hours and enables more installs per day.

Affected Stakeholders

Operations Manager, Dispatch / Scheduler, Installation Team Leader, Field Technicians / Monteure, Managing Director, Project Manager Office Fit‑Out

Related Business Risks