Cost of Poor Quality from CAPA Failures
Definition
Customer complaint investigations trigger CAPA under TGA PRAC procedure, requiring detailed CAPA documentation to prevent reoccurrence. Failures result in recalls, which incur direct costs including product disposal, refunds, and regulatory reporting.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 50,000+ per major recall event (rework, refunds, disposal); 2-5% of revenue in quality failures for non-compliant manufacturers
- Frequency: Per customer complaint or non-conformance leading to recall
- Root Cause: Manual CAPA processes fail to identify root causes, leading to recurring issues and TGA-mandated recalls
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Personal care product manufacturers in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 50,000+ per recall event on investigations and corrections. Automation of complaint investigation and CAPA eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Quality Manager, Manufacturing Director, Compliance Officer
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
ACCC Fines for Consumer Complaints
Rework and Waste in CAPA Processes
Cost of Poor Quality in Batch Production
Capacity Loss from Quality Rework
GMP Non-Compliance Audit Failures
AICIS Non-Compliance Fines
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence