🇦🇺Australia

Bad Metering System Decisions

2 verified sources

Definition

Poor choice of meters (e.g., DP vs. ultrasonic) results in systems unfit for custody transfer, amplifying losses over time.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: AUD 500,000+ annually from inefficient metering setups[1][5]
  • Frequency: Ongoing from system installation
  • Root Cause: Insufficient data on meter performance for Australian pipeline conditions

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Oil & gas firms in Australia 🇦🇺 incur AUD 1M+ yearly from suboptimal custody transfer systems. Data-driven selection tools mitigate decision risks.

Affected Stakeholders

Procurement Managers, Engineering Leads

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Custody Transfer Mismeasurement Losses

AUD millions per year per company from 0.1-0.5% measurement error on large volumes[1][3]

Idle Pipeline Capacity from Metering Disputes

AUD 50,000-200,000 per day in lost capacity from transfer halts[3]

Kapazitäts- und Ertragsverlust durch konservative Betriebsgrenzen bei unklarer Korrosionslage

Quantified: typischerweise 2–5 % entgangener Transporterlöse; bei einer Pipeline mit AUD 50–60 Mio. Jahresumsatz entspricht dies etwa AUD 1–3 Mio. Umsatzverlust p.a. durch konservative Druck- und Durchsatzbegrenzung

Fehlentscheidungen bei Lebensdauerverlängerung und Investitionen durch unzureichende Korrosionsdaten

Quantified: ca. 20–40 % überhöhte Investitionssummen bei CP-Retrofits und Lebensdauerverlängerungsprojekten; für typische Projekte im Umfang von AUD 5–10 Mio. entspricht dies AUD 1–4 Mio. Fehlallokation pro Projekt

Pipeline Emergency Response Fines

AUD 50,000 - 500,000 per incident in fines and cleanup; ongoing AS 2885 compliance costs 20-50 hours/month per site.

Spill Remediation Overruns

AUD 100,000 - 1M per major spill remediation; 40+ hours overtime per event.

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence