🇦🇺Australia

Billing Dispute Delays

1 verified sources

Definition

GSAs include detailed billing/payment obligations but vary considerably, causing disputes over capacity utilisation and charges.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: 30-60 days delayed payments on monthly capacity tariffs (2-5% finance cost on AUD millions)[1]
  • Frequency: Monthly billing cycles
  • Root Cause: Non-standardised commercial-in-confidence contract terms

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Gas pipeline operators in Australia 🇦🇺 lose 30-60 days in Accounts Receivable due to capacity billing disputes. Automated contract matching accelerates cash collection.

Affected Stakeholders

Pipeliners, Billing teams, Accounts Receivable

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Contractual Congestion Losses

AUD millions in lost gas delivery revenue per pipeline due to unused capacity[1]

Untraded Capacity Payment Obligations

Full reference tariff payments (AUD 100k+ annually per GWth/d capacity unit) for unused reserved capacity[1][3]

AEMO Registration Non-Compliance

AUD 11,100+ per breach AEMO civil penalties plus lost auction revenue[2]

Kapazitäts- und Ertragsverlust durch konservative Betriebsgrenzen bei unklarer Korrosionslage

Quantified: typischerweise 2–5 % entgangener Transporterlöse; bei einer Pipeline mit AUD 50–60 Mio. Jahresumsatz entspricht dies etwa AUD 1–3 Mio. Umsatzverlust p.a. durch konservative Druck- und Durchsatzbegrenzung

Fehlentscheidungen bei Lebensdauerverlängerung und Investitionen durch unzureichende Korrosionsdaten

Quantified: ca. 20–40 % überhöhte Investitionssummen bei CP-Retrofits und Lebensdauerverlängerungsprojekten; für typische Projekte im Umfang von AUD 5–10 Mio. entspricht dies AUD 1–4 Mio. Fehlallokation pro Projekt

Custody Transfer Mismeasurement Losses

AUD millions per year per company from 0.1-0.5% measurement error on large volumes[1][3]

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence