🇦🇺Australia

Renomination Capacity Curtailments

2 verified sources

Definition

Shipper nominations exceeding available capacity result in pro-rata cuts; material renominations (>10% variance) require detailed contemporaneous records kept for 5 years.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: 10%+ daily capacity loss (e.g., AUD 20,000+ per day for mid-size nomination at $2/GJ)
  • Frequency: Daily during peak demand or imbalance periods
  • Root Cause: Manual delays in intra-day renominations and poor advance nomination forecasting

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Pipeline shippers in Australia lose 10%+ capacity daily from nomination mismatches. Automation of daily nominations and renominations prevents curtailments.

Affected Stakeholders

Shippers, Pipeline Operators, Schedulers

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Operator Nomination Non-Compliance Penalties

AUD 10,000 - 100,000+ per facility in fines and remediation costs

Unscheduled Nomination Revenue Loss

AUD 0.3 per GJ/day of unscheduled firm MDQ (e.g., AUD 5,000+ monthly per 50 TJ/day contract)

Kapazitäts- und Ertragsverlust durch konservative Betriebsgrenzen bei unklarer Korrosionslage

Quantified: typischerweise 2–5 % entgangener Transporterlöse; bei einer Pipeline mit AUD 50–60 Mio. Jahresumsatz entspricht dies etwa AUD 1–3 Mio. Umsatzverlust p.a. durch konservative Druck- und Durchsatzbegrenzung

Fehlentscheidungen bei Lebensdauerverlängerung und Investitionen durch unzureichende Korrosionsdaten

Quantified: ca. 20–40 % überhöhte Investitionssummen bei CP-Retrofits und Lebensdauerverlängerungsprojekten; für typische Projekte im Umfang von AUD 5–10 Mio. entspricht dies AUD 1–4 Mio. Fehlallokation pro Projekt

Custody Transfer Mismeasurement Losses

AUD millions per year per company from 0.1-0.5% measurement error on large volumes[1][3]

Idle Pipeline Capacity from Metering Disputes

AUD 50,000-200,000 per day in lost capacity from transfer halts[3]

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence