Cost of Poor Quality from Cycle Imbalances
Definition
Cooling dominates cycle time; poor optimization leads to higher scrap rates and rework, directly costing material and labor.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Scrap rate >4% equals AUD 30,000-150,000/year loss; 4-sec cycle delay adds 5% scrap risk
- Frequency: Per shift or batch
- Root Cause: Suboptimal mold cooling and process parameters without OEE visibility
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Plastics manufacturers in Australia 🇦🇺 incur AUD 50,000+ yearly in scrap/rework from cycle time faults. OEE automation reduces scrap to under 4%.
Affected Stakeholders
Quality Engineer, Process Technician
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Capacity Loss from Extended Cycle Times
Cost Overrun from Idle Equipment
Cost of Poor Quality
Waste from Trial-and-Error
Capacity Loss from Rework
PPAP-Bottlenecks und Freigabe-Verzögerungen
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence