🇦🇺Australia

Verlust durch Inventurschwund und Medikamentendiebstahl in der Apotheke

4 verified sources

Definition

Australian pharmacists are legally obligated to maintain detailed records of supply, including labelling with patient name, date dispensed and a reference number linking to the prescription record for poisons and drugs of dependence, and to keep accurate prescription and supply records in pharmacy dispensing systems.[2][4] For drugs of dependence and Schedule 8 medicines, legislation and regulatory guidance require strict controls, including lawful possession and supply only at approved premises, with pharmacists personally ensuring safe and appropriate supply and being alert to excessive or suspicious requests.[4][5] Where pharmacies rely on manual counts and paper‑based or loosely controlled electronic systems, small discrepancies in controlled‑drug stock can accumulate without timely investigation. When auditors or inspectors identify that stock on hand does not reconcile with the controlled‑drug register and prescription records, the pharmacy must write off the discrepancy as loss, and may have to conduct internal investigations and report the loss as a reportable drug event to regulators.[4][5] Logic‑based estimation: given the high wholesale value of many controlled and specialised prescription medicines, a mid‑sized community pharmacy experiencing periodic untraced losses of even 1–2 packs per month of high‑value items (e.g. Schedule 8 opioids, ADHD stimulants, or other dependence‑prone drugs) at an average wholesale cost of AUD 200–400 per pack would incur inventory losses of approximately AUD 2,400–9,600 per year. Larger or higher‑risk pharmacies could easily see annual shrinkage in the AUD 10,000–20,000 range when including non‑controlled but high‑value items. These amounts are pure margin erosion, as insurers typically do not compensate unexplained shrinkage or non‑burglary‑related losses; they are borne directly by the pharmacy's P&L.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Logic-based estimate: AUD 2,400–9,600 per year in controlled‑drug shrinkage for a typical community pharmacy and up to AUD 10,000–20,000 per year for higher‑risk, higher‑volume sites; equivalent to the wholesale cost of 1–2 high‑value packs lost per month plus write‑offs detected at annual or regulatory stocktakes.
  • Frequency: Ongoing, with discrepancies commonly discovered at periodic stocktakes or during regulator or wholesaler audits; small shrinkage events may occur monthly, but are often recognised as a lump‑sum write‑off annually.
  • Root Cause: Reliance on manual controlled‑drug registers and manual counts; lack of integrated dispensing‑to‑inventory linkage; insufficient segregation of duties for storage and dispensing of Schedule 8 and other high‑value medicines; weak investigation and documentation of small discrepancies until they accumulate.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Australian retail pharmacies 🇦🇺 lose an estimated AUD 5,000–20,000 per year in shrinkage of high‑value prescription and controlled drugs due to weak dispensing controls. Automating stock‑controlled dispensing, electronic S8 registers and reconciliation workflows can significantly reduce these avoidable write‑offs.

Affected Stakeholders

Pharmacy owner, Pharmacist in charge, Dispensing pharmacists, Inventory and stock control staff, Group pharmacy operations managers

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Bußgelder wegen Verstößen gegen Betäubungsmittel- und Suchtgiftvorschriften

Logic-based estimate: AUD 10,000–20,000 regulatory fine per serious controlled‑drug non‑compliance event plus AUD 5,000–10,000 legal/management cost; cumulative AUD 50,000–100,000 over 5 years for a non‑automated high‑volume pharmacy; plus potential AUD 5,000–10,000 per year in lost script revenue due to reputational damage or restricted authority.

Einnahmeverluste durch fehlerhafte Abgabe und Dokumentation von verschreibungspflichtigen Arzneimitteln

Logic-based estimate: AUD 2,700–10,000 per year in lost gross margin from rejected/unbilled prescriptions plus AUD 4,200–12,000 per year in pharmacist rework time at AUD 70–100 per hour, totalling roughly AUD 10,000–30,000 annually for a mid‑sized Australian community pharmacy.

Langsame Kassenabstimmung und Warteschlangen

LOGIC: 1–2 Arbeitsstunden/Tag je Filiale für Kassenabstimmung und Bargeldtransporte (≈10.000–20.000 AUD p.a. bei 30 AUD/Stunde) plus 0,1–0,3 % Umsatzverlust durch Warteschlangen (5.000–15.000 AUD p.a. bei 5 Mio. AUD Jahresumsatz).

Fehlbuchungen und nicht erfasste Barumsätze

LOGIC: 0,1–0,4 % des Jahresumsatzes als dauerhafte, ungeklärte Kassendifferenzen; z. B. 5.000–20.000 AUD p.a. bei 5 Mio. AUD Umsatz.

Überhöhte Personal- und Sicherheitskosten für manuelles Bargeldhandling

LOGIC: 11.000–19.000 AUD p.a. zusätzliche Personalkosten je Filiale für manuelle Cash‑Handling‑Tätigkeiten plus 5.000–10.000 AUD p.a. für Sicherheitsmaßnahmen ohne optimiertes System.

HACCP Non-Compliance Fines

AUD 5,000 - 50,000+ per violation (statutory fines for audit failures and improper hazard controls)

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence