Authentication Failures Leading to Grading Fees on Fakes
Definition
Retailers in the trading card and collectibles market submit items to third-party graders like PSA via middlemen. Failed authentication results in fee liability without value addition, causing direct financial loss on inventory shrinkage from fakes.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 50+ per card in grading fees for non-genuine items (typical PSA service levels)
- Frequency: Per submission of questionable inventory
- Root Cause: Manual pre-screening lacks advanced tech, leading to submission of altered or fake items
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Retail Recyclable Materials & Used Merchandise players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 50+ per fake card on grading fees. Automation of pre-authentication eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Inventory managers, Authenticators, Store owners
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
Related Business Risks
Grading Service Upcharges on High-Value Items
Prolonged Grading Turnaround Delays Inventory Turnover
Idle Equipment and Manual Delays in Authentication
Manual Reconciliation Time Drag
Cash Payout Fraud & Shrinkage
AML/CTF Cash Reporting Failures
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence