🇦🇺Australia

Liquidity Overcommitment Risks

2 verified sources

Definition

CPs legally settle all novated trades regardless of client receipt, requiring high capital buffers. Manual processes exacerbate poor visibility into net exposures.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: AUD millions in excess capital/liquidity requirements per CP; potential to revolutionise with real-time reducing costs by 50-80%
  • Frequency: Ongoing for T+2 cycle per trade
  • Root Cause: Batch settlement and bilateral confirmation delays pre-novation

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Third-party clearing in Australia 🇦🇺 incurs significant capital costs from novation exposures. Real-time clearing automation removes T+2 liquidity drag.

Affected Stakeholders

Clearing Participants, Risk Managers, Treasury

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence