Curtailment-Driven Energy Production Losses from Bat Monitoring
Definition
Curtailment studies show 54% bat mortality reduction but at cost of forgone low-speed generation, informed by mandatory monitoring data.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 50,000-500,000 annual revenue loss per farm from 5-20% reduced capacity factor during curtailment periods
- Frequency: Ongoing during high bat activity seasons
- Root Cause: Monitoring data triggers mandatory curtailment to comply with EPBC conditions
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Australian wind farms lose 5-10% capacity from bat curtailment post-monitoring. Smart automation optimizes cut-in speeds without mortality risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Plant Manager, Energy Yield Analyst
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
Related Business Risks
Manual Labour Costs in Bird Bat Carcass Surveys
Blade Repair Cost Overruns
Turbine Downtime from Blade Failures
Manual Inspection Labour Costs
Curtailment Revenue Loss
Grid-Induced Capacity Curtailment
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence