🇧🇷Brazil

Multas por Não Conformidade com Documentação NR-12

2 verified sources

Definition

NR-12 requires that all maintenance interventions be registered with: intervention date, service performed, parts replaced, equipment safety conditions, responsible person name, and safety conclusion. Records must be available to workers, CIPA, SESMT, and Auditoria Fiscal do Trabalho. Non-compliance detected during labor inspections results in administrative fines.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: LOGIC-estimated: Fines range typically from R$1,000–R$50,000+ per violation (based on Brazilian labor fine scales for safety non-compliance); annual audit risk affects 30–60% of facilities with inadequate documentation.
  • Frequency: Annual labor audits; triggered on-demand during accident investigations or compliance sweeps.
  • Root Cause: Manual documentation systems lack real-time logging, searchability, and audit trail. Incomplete records discovered during inspections. No automated verification of required fields.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Brazilian industrial maintenance companies waste resources on manual compliance management and face audit penalties for documentation failures. Automation of inspection logging and record management eliminates fines and audit risk.

Affected Stakeholders

Maintenance Managers, Safety Officers (SESMT), CIPA Representatives, Operations Directors

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Overhead de Gestão Manual de Documentação de Inspeção NR-12

LOGIC-estimated: 20–40 hours/month per maintenance team × R$150–R$250/hour (technician labor) = R$3,000–R$10,000/month in overhead; annually R$36,000–R$120,000 per facility.

Perda de Capacidade Produtiva por Atraso em Autorização de Manutenção

LOGIC-estimated: 5–10% capacity loss on preventive/corrective maintenance = 2–4 hours/week per technician × R$200/hour = R$800–R$1,600/week per technician; extrapolated across 10-technician teams: R$400,000–R$800,000/year in foregone productive capacity.

Multas por Erros em NF-e de Serviços T&M

R$1.500-R$10.000 por NF-e rejeitada; 2-5% receita em penalidades[Search Hints]

Sobrecusto com Horas Extras e Estoque Excessivo

R$15-40 hours overtime/tech/month; 15-25% excess inventory costs[2][3]

Serviços Não Faturados por Falta de Aprovação Digital

R$10.000-50.000/ano em serviços não faturados (estimado 20-40 OS/mês a R$1.000 cada com 10-20% delay)

Atraso no Faturamento por Aprovação Manual de OS

30-60 dias extras em DSO; R$20-40 horas/mês em verificação manual (equivalente R$5.000/mês em custo de capital)

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence