🇧🇷Brazil

Incrustação e Corrosão em Equipamentos Geotérmicos

3 verified sources

Definition

In geothermal power plants, scaling and corrosion from geothermal fluids cause equipment failures, requiring frequent maintenance or replacements, leading to cost overruns in an emerging Brazilian market.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: R$ 5-15 milhões per 30MW plant in accelerated depreciation and downtime (estimated 5-10% of US$ 460M equipment market cap impacted annually)[3]
  • Frequency: Continuous during operations
  • Root Cause: Custom manufacturing and low-volume production increase costs for corrosion-resistant equipment; Custo Brasil amplifies import/logistics expenses

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Geothermal power players in Brasil 🇧🇷 waste R$ 10-20 milhões annually on equipment replacement and downtime from scaling/corrosion. Automation of monitoring and chemical dosing eliminates this risk.

Affected Stakeholders

Gerente de Manutenção, Engenheiro de Processos, Contador Industrial

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Multas por Atraso ou Omissão de Pagamento da CFEM

Logic-based estimate: R$ 50,000–500,000 per operator per year (statutory fines + late payment interest at SELIC rates, typically 10–15% of unpaid CFEM balance)

Atraso em Autorização e Verificação de Direitos Minerários e Terras

Logic-based estimate: 6–18 months project delay = R$ 2–15 million in deferred revenue per project (assuming R$ 2–10M monthly operating costs and lost sales)

Custo Brasil: Overhead de Conformidade Fiscal em Pagamentos de Royalties

R$ 80,000–200,000 per lease area per year (40 hours/month × 12 months × R$ 175–450/hour labor cost, including overhead)

Gargalo: Atraso na Aprovação de Áreas de Interesse Mineral e Leilões ANM

R$ 3–8 million per project per year (equipment mobilization cost, idle rig rental, deferred drilling season revenue)

Perda de Capacidade - Navios Sonda Ociosos em Operações de Perfuração

R$ 180,000,000+ (documented Petrobras case); R$ 15,000,000+ per month per idle drillship at standard day rates

Sobrecusto de Construção de Poços - Ineficiência de Tempo em Perfurações Pré-sal

R$ 12,000,000 per well per 20% time reduction; R$ 8,333,000+ per day saved at pre-salt drilling rates

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence