🇧🇷Brazil

Decisões de Sourcing Mal-Informadas por Falta de Dados Consolidados de Pesca

2 verified sources

Definition

MPA announced efforts to clear a decade-long backlog in fishery stock data by end of 2025. Until now, Brazil does not track: (1) national fish landing volumes, (2) ocean biomass by species, (3) vessel-level catch performance. Companies cannot assess whether a supplier is fishing from sustainable stocks or near-collapse fisheries. Blue shark and spiny lobster regulations show evidence of poor catch limit enforcement. Companies using manual supplier audits miss real-time changes in fishing restrictions.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: 8–15% of annual sourcing budget (estimated based on typical supply chain disruption costs from hidden compliance failures). For a mid-size Brazilian seafood processor sourcing R$ 50M annually: R$ 4,000,000–7,500,000 annual loss from supply interruptions, emergency re-sourcing, and spot-market premiums.
  • Frequency: Continuous (affecting all sourcing decisions until data gap closed by Q4 2025)
  • Root Cause: Government data gaps + no real-time supplier biomass/catch status API + manual supplier verification processes

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Brazilian seafood manufacturers lose 8–15% of annual sourcing budget to supply interruptions and supplier failures due to inability to access consolidated fishing data. Real-time ocean biomass and vessel-level catch data access eliminates blind sourcing decisions.

Affected Stakeholders

Procurement Directors, Supply Chain Planners, Risk Managers, Sustainability Officers

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Perda de Receita por Tarifa Comercial e Restrições de Exportação

R$ 2,200,000,000 (U.S. market loss ~$400M + 900M reais government relief gap + estimated 1.3B reais secondary supply chain disruption)

Risco de Rejeição de Exportações por Não-Conformidade com MMPA (EUA) e Regulações Emergentes

R$ 200,000–500,000 per rejected shipment (typical 20-40 ft container value in frozen seafood: USD 50K–120K). For a company shipping 10+ containers/month to U.S.: risk exposure R$ 24,000,000–60,000,000 annually if compliance verification gaps exist.

Multas e Sanções por Não Conformidade em Rotulagem de Alimentos

LOGIC-based estimate: ANVISA administrative fines (typical range R$ 5,000–R$ 50,000+ per violation for food products); Product recalls and market withdrawal; Liability exposure from allergen-related customer harm (estimated 3-10% of affected SKUs in non-compliant batches). Exact amounts unavailable in search results.

Riscos de Recolhimento de Produtos e Perda de Receita por Rotulagem Incorreta

LOGIC-based estimate: 3–10% of SKU inventory tied up in label rework during compliance deadline transitions; Recall costs (destruction, logistics, remanufacturing): R$ 50,000–R$ 500,000+ per major recall; Lost revenue during shelf withdrawal (estimated 1–3 weeks market absence per product line)

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence