Unbilanzierte Materialmengen und Preiseskalationsfehlgeschäfte
Definition
Material takeoff performed manually from 2D plans or incomplete BIM data. Quantities estimated with buffer (e.g., +10% scrap allowance). Actual usage differs. Customer billed for estimated, but actual waste/material costs differ. Manual price escalation clauses buried in contracts, rarely applied. Over-procurement stored as inventory (unrecoverable cost).
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: €20,000–€100,000 annually in lost material revenue and waste write-offs per manufacturer
- Frequency: Per project; cumulative across multiple active projects
- Root Cause: Manual takeoff + incomplete BIM data + no automated invoice matching + poor contract clause tracking = mismatches between estimated, procured, and billed quantities.
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Architectural and Structural Metal Manufacturing.
Affected Stakeholders
Estimator, Project Manager, Finance Manager, Warehouse Manager
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Rohstoffpreisvolatilität und Beschaffungsfehlentscheidungen
Lieferkettensorgfaltgesetzgesetz (LkSG) Compliance und Dokumentationsmängel
Mangelnde Marktsicht bei Beschaffungsentscheidungen – Einkaufsfehler
Request Deep Analysis
🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence