Indirekte Kostenallokationsfehler und Überverrechnung bei Rüstungsaufträgen
Definition
Under CAS 401-420, contractors must allocate indirect costs (overhead, G&A, facilities, management) using consistent, documented allocation bases. Manual allocation processes, spreadsheet-based cost pools, or ad-hoc basis changes result in either under-allocation (profit loss on government contracts) or over-allocation (disallowed costs identified in DCAA audits, requiring refunds and penalty adjustments).
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: 2–5% of contract value in allocation errors; for €10M contract: €200,000–€500,000 exposure. DCAA audit disallowances typically 3–7% of questioned costs; FAR allows recovery plus interest (typically 6% annually).
- Frequency: Per cost accounting period (monthly/quarterly); identified in annual or triennial DCAA audits
- Root Cause: Manual cost pool maintenance, lack of real-time labor tracking, allocation base changes not synchronized with contract modifications, German accounting platforms (DATEV, SAP) not configured for multi-segment CAS cost flows, insufficient cost segregation between G&A, overhead, and direct material/labor
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Defense and Space Manufacturing.
Affected Stakeholders
Cost Accountant, Project Controller, Procurement Manager (for cost-plus-fee agreements), Finance Manager
Action Plan
Run AI-powered research on this problem. Each action generates a detailed report with sources.
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
- https://dart.deloitte.com/USDART/home/publications/deloitte/industry/aerospace-defense/accounting-compliance-considerations-usg
- https://www.dcaa.mil/Portals/88/Documents/Guidance/CAM/CAM%20Chapter%2008%20Cost%20Accounting%20Standards_20250826.pdf
- https://www.forvismazars.us/forsights/2024/09/a-guide-to-cost-accounting-standards-cas-compliance