🇩🇪Germany

DSGVO-Bußgelder für Body-Camera-Datenverarbeitung

Updated: Feb 20263 verified sources

Definition

The December 18, 2025 CJEU judgment establishes binding interpretation that body camera footage falls under GDPR Article 13 (information to be provided where data are collected from data subject). German authorities established unified fine procedures in June 2025. Swedish precedent: 16 million kronor (~€1.5 million) fine for body camera operator for GDPR violations, with 4 million kronor specifically allocated for inadequate information provision. German supervisory authorities have signaled enhanced enforcement of data protection by design and default, particularly for systems capturing facial biometric data.

Key Findings

Financial Impact: Hard floor: €5,000–€20,000,000. Swedish precedent: €1.5 million for insufficient disclosure. GDPR Article 58 permits €20 million or 4% global annual turnover (whichever is higher) for information obligation violations. German federal police and 9 state police forces (Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria, Lower Saxony, Hamburg, Hesse, North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate, Saxony, Thuringia) now subject to enforcement.
Frequency: Single enforcement action per non-compliant system or agency = €1.5M–€20M+ per violation. Thuringia's 1,200+ camera deployment alone represents massive exposure surface.
Root Cause: December 18, 2025 CJEU judgment retroactively classified body camera data collection as 'direct' under GDPR Article 13. German authorities (as of June 2025) centralized enforcement mechanisms. Existing deployments in 9 German states lack documented Article 13 disclosure protocols.

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Law Enforcement.

Affected Stakeholders

Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) / Datenschutzbeauftragter, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) / Finanzamtsleiter, Police IT Director / Polizeipräsident, State Interior Ministry Legal Counsel

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39

Solutions for this specific pain
Solutions for all 15 industry pains
Where to find first clients
Pricing & launch costs

Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Fehlende Artikel-9-Dokumentation für biometrische Datenverarbeitung

Estimated €10,000–€15,000,000. Estonian precedent: mandatory assessment fines. Article 58 GDPR permits €20 million or 4% turnover for Article 9 special category violations. Typical DPIA remediation: €50,000–€150,000 per state police force × 9 states = €450,000–€1.35M remediation cost + €5M–€20M penalty exposure.

Fehlende technische Spezifikationen für Datenminimierung und Retention

Estimated €20,000–€5,000,000. Typical manual data retention audit: 100–200 hours @ €150/hour = €15,000–€30,000 per state. Remediation (automated retention system implementation): €100,000–€500,000 per state × 9 states = €900,000–€4.5M. Penalty exposure: €5,000–€5,000,000 per state for Article 25 design-by-default violations.

Request Deep Analysis

🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence