🇩🇪Germany
Abbruch von Mietverträgen durch Screening-Reibung
1 verified sources
Definition
Prospective tenants drop out due to cumbersome processes, allowing competitors with digital screening to capture deals in competitive markets.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: 20-30% lost deals; €5,000+ annual revenue per property
- Frequency: Per application funnel
- Root Cause: Slow, paperwork-heavy verification process
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Leasing Residential Real Estate.
Affected Stakeholders
Sales/Leasing Agents
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Unlock to reveal
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Unlock to reveal
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
$99$39
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Kosten durch schlechte Mieter-Auswahl
€3,000+ per bad tenant (2-3 months rent + eviction/legal fees)
Verzögerungen durch langsame Mieter-Prüfung
€1,500-3,000/month per delayed unit (average Berlin rent)
Kosten der schlechten Qualität bei Übergabeinspektionen
80% mailing costs + deposit delays (2-4 weeks, €500-1,000/unit in holding costs)
Kostenübertragungsverbot bei Mietvertragsstellung
50-200€ Erstellkosten pro Vertrag (nicht umlegbar)
Verzögerte Kaution-Freigabe durch manuelle Prüfung
€3.000-15.000 pro Wohnung (3 Monatsmieten) x 2-6 Monate Bindung
GoBD-Verstoß bei unstrukturierter Inspektion
€5.000-50.000 Bußgeld + Nachzahlung pro Audit
Request Deep Analysis
🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence