Manuelle Kodierungskapazität und Verzögerung bei Rechnungsverarbeitung (Time-to-Cash Drag)
Definition
The EBM Laboratory Reform 2025 introduces ~100 new or revised EBM codes, with devaluation of ~40–60% of existing service codes. Manual billing teams must: (1) map each test performed to the correct EBM code(s), (2) validate that flat rates are correctly applied (collection material, order entry), (3) cross-reference service devaluations to ensure correct pricing, (4) audit claims for completeness before submission, and (5) handle rejections from Krankenkassen due to coding errors. This workflow requires 30–60 minutes per lab per day (minimum) for a mid-sized lab (100–150 tests/day). Bottlenecks delay claims submission by 5–15 days, extending AR cycles and reducing cash flow. Large laboratories with >500 daily tests face 8–12 hour/day coding overhead, effectively requiring 1–1.5 FTE dedicated to coding alone.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: €40,000–€150,000 annually per lab in delayed cash flow (opportunity cost at 5% annual borrowing rate on AR float). Staffing cost: €25,000–€80,000/year (1–1.5 FTE at €25k/year loaded cost) spent on manual coding. Network of 10 labs: €400,000–€1.5M/year in combined efficiency loss. AR acceleration of 10–20 days = €50,000–€200,000 working capital freed per mid-sized lab.
- Frequency: Continuous, daily (every lab claim). Acute during post-reform transition (Jan–Jun 2025) when staff are retraining on new codes.
- Root Cause: EBM coding complexity (100+ new/revised codes) combined with no mandatory industry-standard automated billing platform. Laboratories currently rely on legacy billing software (often Excel-based or custom in-house systems) that do not auto-validate EBM codes or flat rates. Manual workflow is the default industry practice, but creates predictable bottlenecks under regulatory change.
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Medical and Diagnostic Laboratories.
Affected Stakeholders
Billing clerks / coding specialists, Laboratory managers (workflow oversight), Finance controllers (AR management)
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Gebührendevaluation und Abrechnungslücken bei Laborreformen
Betriebsprüfung-Risiko durch manuelle EBM-Kodierung und Rechnungsungenauigkeiten
Rückforderungen und Refund-Rework durch falsche EBM-Kodierung
Verpasste Erstattungen bei Eligibility-Fehlern
IVDR-Verstöße in Diagnostiklabors
Verzögerte Abrechnung durch ePA-Integration
Request Deep Analysis
🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence