Fehlentscheidungen in Beschaffung und Produktionsplanung durch mangelnde Echtzeit-Bestandssicht
Definition
Scenario: Tank farm site manufactures blended product (e.g., lubricant blend of base oil + additives). Production planner forecasts 50-liter batch for Wednesday. Tuesday, planner reviews ERP inventory: base oil tank shows 120 liters. Plan approved; procurement does not order additional base oil. Tuesday evening, monthly reconciliation conducted: actual count = 95 liters (5% variance from last month, unexplained). Planner not informed (reconciliation is finance function, not automatically flagged to operations). Wednesday, production start: actual base oil available = 95 liters. Batch plan calls for 50 liters; OK. But the 30-liter buffer assumed by planner is now 15 liters. If next batch (Thursday) also calls for 50 liters, site is short 35 liters. Planner must: (a) reduce Thursday batch (15-liter production loss, €500–€2,000 lost margin); (b) rush-order base oil (€3,000–€5,000 premium for expedited delivery + handling); or (c) delay Thursday batch (customer penalty or lost sale, €2,000–€10,000). Search result 1 notes: 'Tank inventory is not just quantity; it's also status' — implying that quarantined tanks (under QA hold) are treated as available in outdated ERP snapshot. If planner does not know a tank is quarantined, plan is impossible to execute.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Rush purchase premium: €3,000–€8,000 per incident (3–5× per year) = €9,000–€40,000/year; Production delay/lost sales: €2,000–€10,000 per incident (2–4× per year) = €4,000–€40,000/year; Total: €13,000–€80,000/year per site. Improved inventory visibility reduces rush events by 60–80% → savings €8,000–€64,000/year.
- Frequency: 3–8 rush-purchase or production-delay incidents per year (depending on demand volatility and forecast accuracy).
- Root Cause: Inventory data in ERP not synchronized in real time; reconciliation is monthly or daily (but not visible to planners <2–4 hours after event); tank status (quarantined, available) not flagged in WMS/ERP; no SCADA integration with demand planning system.
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Oil and Coal Product Manufacturing.
Affected Stakeholders
Demand planner, Procurement manager, Operations scheduler, Production supervisor, Inventory controller
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Inventarverschleiss und Diebstahl durch mangelhafte Ereignisverfolgung
GoBD-Verstöße und Betriebsprüfungsrisiko durch fehlende Nachvollziehbarkeit
Umweltbußgelder und Haftungsrisiko durch unerkannte Lecks und Verschüttungen
Manuelle Monatsabstimmung: Zeitverschwendung und verspätete Ursachenanalyse
Lieferkettengesetz (LkSG) Compliance & Bußgeldzahlungen
Betriebsstättenstilllegung durch Nichtvorlage von Genehmigungen
Request Deep Analysis
🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence