Verstoß gegen Anlageverordnung bei IPS-Review
Definition
Strenge Quoten (7.5% für Alternativanlagen, 35% Risikokapital, 1% pro Emittent) erfordern kontinuierliche IPS-Prüfung. Draft Circular erweitert Anforderungen auf Look-Through und Dokumentation, manuelle Prozesse verursachen Verstöße.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: €10,000-€100,000 BaFin-Sanktion pro Verstoß; 20-50 Stunden/Monat manuelle Review
- Frequency: Quartalsweise Reviews; Betriebsprüfungen jährlich
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Pension Funds.
Affected Stakeholders
Portfoliomanager, Compliance Officer, IPS-Reviewer
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Kapazitätsverlust durch manuelle Quotenprüfung
Fehlinvestitionen durch unvollständige IPS-Daten
Überzahlungen und Rückforderungen
Überlastung der Rentenämter
Verlorene Ansprüche durch Prozessfrustration
Verzögerte Hinterbliebenenrente-Auszahlung
Request Deep Analysis
🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence