GoBD-Verstöße bei Anlagenverwaltung
Definition
In tool transfer and asset management, manual processes fail GoBD digital evidence requirements, exposing firms to tax audit penalties during Betriebsprüfungen. Plastics firms with high-value molds and machinery face elevated risks from poor asset visibility.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: €10,000-50,000 per Betriebsprüfung failure; 20-40 hours/month manual tracking
- Frequency: Annual tax audits for SMEs >€600k revenue
- Root Cause: Manual tool transfer logs lack digital immutability required by GoBD
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Plastics Manufacturing.
Affected Stakeholders
Finanzleiter, Werkzeugmanager, Steuerberater
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Bürokratiekosten durch LkSG-Anlagenprüfungen
Leerlauf durch manuelle Werkzeugtransfers
Qualitätsausfälle durch Produktionsunterbrechungen
Kosten der schlechten Qualität durch Farbunterschiede
Materialverschwendung durch Farbabweichungen
Kapazitätsverlust durch Farbanpassungsengpässe
Request Deep Analysis
🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence