Unterschiede zwischen GOT-Maximalabrechnung und Insurance-Erstattung
Definition
Vets charge up to 3-4x GOT base, but insurers reimburse max 2x, leaving gap unpaid unless pet owner covers difference. Common in insurance and wellness plans.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: €50-200 pro Behandlung (1x Gap bei 1.5-2x Durchschnittssatz)
- Frequency: Bei 30-50% der Insurance-Fälle
- Root Cause: Fehlende Pre-Check von Insurance-Limits vor Behandlung
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Veterinary Services.
Affected Stakeholders
Tierärzte, Billing Staff, Practice Owners
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
GOT-Abrechnungsfehler bei Versicherungsabrechnungen
Verzögerte Insurance-Reimbursements durch unvollständige GOT-Rechnungen
GOT-Rechnungsverstöße und Betriebsprüfungsrisiken
Verzögerte Rechnungsstellung für Boarding-Dienste
Kundenabwanderung durch lange Wartezeiten
Verzögerte Abrechnung durch unvollständige Anamnese
Request Deep Analysis
🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence