Inventar-Schrumpfung durch unkontrollierte Lagerprozesse
Definition
FAO methods highlight sources of error in loss estimation (e.g., infested grains, damaged portions), common in German post-harvest (BMELV data). Ties to potential inventory fraud in manual systems.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Bis zu 11% Gewichtsverlust (Äpfel); typisch 3-5% unkontrolliert
- Frequency: Monatlich während Entnahme
- Root Cause: Schädlinge, Sekundärschädlinge, manuelle Trennung ungenau
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Wholesale Raw Farm Products.
Affected Stakeholders
Lagermanager, Sicherheitsbeauftragter, Interner Auditor
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Lagerverluste und Schrumpfung bei Rohlandwirtschaftsprodukten
Kosten durch ungenaue Verlustberechnung im Lager
Warenverluste durch unkontrollierte Eingangsabnahme
LkSG Bürokratie Overhead Kosten
Falsche Einkaufsentscheidungen durch mangelnde Preistransparenz
LkSG-Nichteinhaltung Bußgelder
Request Deep Analysis
🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence