🇮🇳India

गलत खरीद निर्णय (Poor Purchasing Decisions Due to Inventory Blind Spots)

2 verified sources

Definition

Search result [4] emphasizes 'traceability is essential' and real-time data access prevents poor inventory decisions. Without automated FIFO, purchase managers cannot answer: 'Which batches expire in 30 days?' or 'Which SKUs are stuck in back storage?' This leads to redundant purchasing and stockouts.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: 15-25% excess carrying cost (inventory holding cost × excess stock); 5-10% emergency procurement premium = ₹15,00,000–₹40,00,000 annually for mid-sized facility
  • Frequency: Bi-weekly to monthly purchase cycles
  • Root Cause: Lack of real-time inventory visibility; manual reconciliation delays; absence of predictive analytics for demand/expiry

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Manual inventory tracking causes 15-25% excess stock carrying costs and 5-10% emergency procurement premiums. Real-time FIFO dashboards optimize purchase orders, reducing carrying costs by ₹15-40 lakh annually for mid-sized manufacturers.

Affected Stakeholders

Procurement Manager, Supply Chain Manager, Finance Manager, Inventory Planner

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

खराब माल का नुकसान (Spoilage और Waste Loss)

₹2,00,000–₹5,00,000 per month (8-15% of raw material cost for mid-sized preserves manufacturers); ₹24,00,000–₹60,00,000 annually

FSSAI/HACCP अनुपालन दंड (FSSAI Penalties and Audit Failures)

₹1,00,000–₹10,00,000 per audit failure (product seizure + fines); ₹5,00,000–₹20,00,000 for facility closure (lost revenue + compliance remediation)

मैनुअल FIFO ट्रैकिंग में समय नुकसान (Manual FIFO Tracking Time Delays)

40-60 hours/month × ₹300–₹500/hour (warehouse supervisor wage) = ₹12,000–₹30,000/month or ₹1,44,000–₹3,60,000 annually; Lost sales capacity: 5-10% of potential throughput = ₹5,00,000–₹20,00,000 annually

FSSAI अनुपालन दंड और संयंत्र बंदी जोखिम (FSSAI Compliance Fines and Factory Shutdown Risk)

₹50,000–₹5,00,000 per compliance violation; factory shutdown = ₹2,00,000–₹50,00,000 lost revenue per week (estimated for medium preserve manufacturers)

HACCP कार्यान्वयन और परामर्श लागत (HACCP Implementation and Consulting Costs)

₹5–₹20 lakhs per annum in consulting fees; 200–400 internal staff hours/year (₹2–₹8 lakhs in opportunity cost); repeat audits add ₹2–₹5 lakhs per cycle

HACCP कार्यान्वयन से उत्पादन बाधा (HACCP Implementation Production Bottleneck)

5–10% production capacity loss = ₹15–₹50 lakhs annual lost revenue for mid-size preserve manufacturer (5–10 MT/day capacity); manual monitoring = 40–60 staff hours/month diverted

Request Deep Analysis

🇮🇳 Be first to access this market's intelligence