🇮🇳India

Specification Change Scope Creep और Unbilled Services

2 verified sources

Definition

Lack of clear specification scope definitions and change control processes causes clients to request iterative modifications without cost implications. R&D rework, re-testing, packaging redesign, and regulatory re-filing are treated as included services, eroding margin.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: ₹5-12 lakhs/year (unbilled rework + testing + regulatory re-filing); 10-15% margin loss per unbilled specification change cycle
  • Frequency: Per-order (average 2-4 specification changes per order)
  • Root Cause: Unclear statement of work (SOW) on specification ownership; no change control gate; weak client communication on change billing

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Indian private label manufacturers lose ₹5-12 lakhs/year to unbilled specification changes and scope creep. Formal specification change control with documented billing gates recovers 70-85% of hidden service costs.

Affected Stakeholders

Sales Manager, Project Manager, R&D Lead, Finance Controller

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Request Deep Analysis

🇮🇳 Be first to access this market's intelligence