🇮🇳India

ट्रेसेबिलिटी सिस्टम कार्यान्वयन और समन्वय की उच्च लागत (High Cost of Manual Traceability Coordination)

1 verified sources

Definition

Research of 226 Indian dry fish supply chain stakeholders identified that lack of a traceability coordinator is a MAJOR BARRIER. In the absence of digital systems, small processors manually track lot numbers, dates, supplier names, and product movement across handwritten logs and spreadsheets. This requires dedicated staff or diverted operational time. The barrier is compounded by 'lack of government support' and absence of subsidies or shared-cost models to justify coordinator hiring.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: ₹3-8 lakh/year per SME (est. 1-2 FTE @ ₹3-4 lakh/year + overhead + audit time); multiplied across 3,477 coastal fishing villages = ₹104-277 crore industry-wide annual waste on manual coordination.
  • Frequency: Monthly recurring; increases during peak harvest seasons and export cycles.
  • Root Cause: Fragmented paper-based lot documentation processes; no unified digital standard; SMEs cannot afford dedicated coordinator role; govt framework exists but implementation delayed.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Indian seafood SMEs waste ₹3-8 lakh annually on manual lot documentation coordination. Deployment of IoT + QR code systems (as per govt framework) automates batch tracking, eliminates coordinator salary, and recovers 15-30 hours/month of productive labor.

Affected Stakeholders

Operations managers, Quality assurance staff, Farm supervisors, Warehouse/logistics coordinators

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

खाद्य सुरक्षा और पता लगाने की क्षमता के लिए बाजार प्रवेश अस्वीकार (Food Safety and Traceability Market Access Denial)

₹62,408 crore annual seafood export revenue at risk; 15-18% shrimp export volume loss (est. ₹9,361-11,233 crore) due to US tariffs and compliance failures; potential loss of 25-40% premium pricing in EU/UK markets (est. ₹15,000-25,000 crore annually if full market denial occurs).

अनुरेखण विफलता के कारण रिकॉल और गुणवत्ता समझौता (Recall and Quality Compromise Due to Traceability Failure)

₹2-10 lakh per recall event (est. product waste ₹1-5 lakh + customer compensation ₹0.5-3 lakh + logistics ₹0.5-2 lakh); industry avg. 2-5 recalls/year across major SMEs = ₹10-50 crore/year total recall losses.

उच्च-मूल्य खरीदारों द्वारा आपूर्ति अस्वीकार (High-Value Buyer Supply Rejection)

₹5-15 lakh per lost buyer relationship (est. 20-30% of annual revenue for premium-focused SMEs); 3,477 coastal fishing villages × 40-60% SMEs with no digital system × ₹10 lakh avg. loss = ₹1,390-2,085 crore industry-wide annual opportunity loss.

Request Deep Analysis

🇮🇳 Be first to access this market's intelligence