🇮🇳India

DISCOM विलंबित भुगतान और NPL जोखिम (DISCOM Payment Delays & Non-Payment Loss)

Updated: Feb 20263 verified sources

Definition

DISCOM payment failures are systemic in India. While contracts specify 30-day payment terms with 2% p.a. surcharge for delays[1], state DISCOMs routinely delay 60-180 days. Under Ind AS 115, revenue must be recognized when control transfers (upon delivery), but ECL provisions must account for DISCOM default risk[1]. This creates: (a) revenue recognized but cash not collected for 3-6 months, (b) surcharge amounts billed but not recovered, (c) ECL provision required, reducing reported profits.

Key Findings

Financial Impact: Logic-based estimate: ₹20-80 lakhs annually per 100 MW project. Assumed ₹5 crore annual PPA revenue, 90-day average cash cycle vs. 30-day contracted term = 60 days excess float × ₹1.4 crore average receivables balance × 8% cost of capital ≈ ₹33 lakhs. Plus ECL provision (1-5% of DISCOM receivables = ₹5-25 lakhs). Total: ₹38-58 lakhs/year.
Frequency: Continuous (monthly invoices affected by 60-90 day delays)
Root Cause: DISCOM credit risk and systemic payment delays. Regulatory framework allows 30-day terms but enforcement is weak. Ind AS 115 ECL requirements force additional provisioning.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Solar power generators in India waste ₹20-80 lakhs annually per 100 MW project on credit losses and working capital drag from DISCOM delays. Automated ECL modeling and early payment factoring eliminate 30-90 day cash cycles.

Affected Stakeholders

Treasury/Cash Management, Accounts Receivable, Credit Risk Assessment, CFO/Finance Planning

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39

Solutions for this specific pain
Solutions for all 15 industry pains
Where to find first clients
Pricing & launch costs

Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

PPA राजस्व घटक गणना त्रुटि (PPA Revenue Component Calculation Errors)

Logic-based estimate: ₹50-200 lakhs annually per 50-100 MW project. Average 2-4% revenue underrecognition across 4-5 revenue line items × ₹2-5 crore annual turnover = ₹40-200 lakhs. Frequency: Monthly billing cycles × 12 months = 144 cycles/year of potential error.

Ind AS 115 लागू विफलता और ऑडिट योग्यता (Ind AS 115 Application Failures & Audit Qualification)

Logic-based estimate: ₹5-50 lakhs per audit qualification event. Restatement liability: ₹10-100 lakhs (restating revenue, receivables, deferred tax). Stock exchange fine: ₹5-25 lakhs per violation. Estimated frequency: 1-2 audit qualifications per 500-1000 MW portfolio per annum.

PPA अनुपालन लागत और प्रदर्शन दंड (PPA Compliance Costs & Performance Penalties)

Logic-based estimate: ₹30-100 lakhs annually per 100-200 MW project. Breakdown: (1) Performance penalty exposure: 0.5-2% of PPA revenue = ₹25-100 lakhs; (2) Compliance costs: 20-40 person-hours/month × ₹5,000/hour = ₹10-20 lakhs/year; (3) SERC filing and regulatory response: ₹5-15 lakhs/year.

Request Deep Analysis

🇮🇳 Be first to access this market's intelligence