🇺🇸United States
Excess Staff Time and Manual Effort in Billing & Collections
2 verified sources
Definition
Highly manual invoicing and collections processes (spreadsheets, emails, phone calls) consume excessive staff time for accountants and AR teams. This labor cost does not directly generate additional revenue and scales poorly as the client base grows.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Industry AR content notes that slow, manual AR processes significantly increase administrative workload; firms adopting AR automation routinely report 20–40% reductions in collections and invoicing effort, implying six‑figure annual labor savings for mid‑size firms.[4][6]
- Frequency: Daily
- Root Cause: Fragmented systems, lack of workflow automation, and reliance on paper or email‑based invoicing force staff to create, send, chase, and reconcile invoices by hand. Accounts receivable experts specifically call out slow, manual processes as a top pain point that “slows cash flow” and burdens teams.[4][6]
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Accounting.
Affected Stakeholders
Accounts receivable clerks, Staff accountants, Office managers, Partners in small firms who personally chase payments
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Data available with full access.
Unlock to reveal
Current Workarounds
Data available with full access.
Unlock to reveal
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
$99$39
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Unbilled and Under‑billed Work from Poor Time & Scope Tracking in Accounting Firms
Surveys of professional service firms (including accounting) indicate write‑downs and write‑offs of 3–8% of billable revenue are common; for a $5M firm this is roughly $150,000–$400,000 per year in lost billings.
Invoice Errors Causing Disputes, Rework, and Write‑offs
AR best‑practice sources highlight that billing errors directly cause payment delays and rework; automation vendors report that correcting and reissuing even a small percentage of invoices can add tens of hours of staff time monthly and lead to fee reductions to resolve disputes.[4][6]
Chronic Collection Delays and High Days Sales Outstanding for Accounting Services
Bank and AR sources state that delayed client payments and high AR days can leave firms financially vulnerable and negatively impact daily operations; reducing DSO by even 5–10 days can free substantial working capital (e.g., $50,000–$200,000 for a $5M firm).[3][4][6]
Lost Productive Capacity to Manual Collections and AR Firefighting
AR and subscription‑billing experts note that manually sending emails and placing calls to each customer with failed or late payments quickly becomes unmanageable and diverts teams from higher‑value activities; in growing firms the volume of such tasks grows with revenue, consuming dozens of hours monthly.[2][4][6]
Non‑Compliance with Surcharge and Payment Regulations in Client Billing
Practice‑management guidance for accounting firms explicitly warns that improper application of credit‑card surcharges can lead to legal issues and emphasizes the need to review varying state regulations to avoid penalties and client mistrust.[5]
Duplicate and Fraudulent Invoices in Financial Operations
Accounts payable and AR pain‑point analyses cite duplicate or fraudulent invoices as a recurring issue that can result in improper payments and losses if not detected.[1][4]
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence