Failure to Comply with Hazardous Chemical Storage Regulations Leading to EPA Enforcement Actions
Definition
Agricultural chemical manufacturing and warehousing facilities repeatedly fail to submit required Risk Management Plans (RMPs) for extremely hazardous substances like formaldehyde, peracetic acid, hydrofluoric acid, and ethyl ether, neglect Process Hazard Analyses, and store incompatible chemicals together, violating CAA, EPCRA, and General Duty Clause requirements. EPA issues compliance orders, conducts inspections revealing systemic deficiencies such as degraded tanks and lack of fire suppression, resulting in ongoing regulatory enforcement. These recurring violations across multiple facilities demonstrate chronic non-compliance in hazardous materials storage.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: $200,000 criminal fine per major violation (e.g., Roberts Chemical case; broader costs from compliance orders and remediation estimated in millions across industry cases)
- Frequency: Recurring - multiple documented cases from 2011-2019 inspections and orders
- Root Cause: Inadequate hazard identification, failure to maintain/update safety plans, and improper segregation of incompatible chemicals in storage
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing.
Affected Stakeholders
Warehouse Managers, Compliance Officers, Plant Operators, EHS Personnel
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$0–$1,000,000 in rejected shipments (per 42 NRAs); penalties from import violations; loss of international business; remediation of returned stock • $0–$1,000,000 in rejected shipments; $50,000–$200,000 in import penalty and rework; international distributor contract loss; obsolete inventory write-offs • $0–$1,000,000 per lost international distributor channel; import penalties indirectly impact manufacturer reputation; product line withdrawal by distributor
Current Workarounds
Ad-hoc RMP documents created per customer request; manual communication with customer operations teams; no systematic tracking of customer storage environments • Cost accountants compile penalty amounts from compliance team email; manual calculation of remediation budget; no real-time hazard cost tracking • Cost accountants manually compile government customer compliance costs; no real-time hazard tracking across agency accounts
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Cleanup and Remediation Costs from Improper Hazardous Materials Storage Spills and Leaks
Product Contamination and Rework from Hazardous Storage Cross-Reactivity
Adulteration of Organic Fertilizers Detected in Quality Testing Leading to Regulatory Non-Compliance
Cost of Poor Quality from Inadequate Contamination and Raw Material Checks in QC Testing
Fines and Certification Suspensions from RUP Distribution Recordkeeping Failures
HazCom/SDS violations in ag-chemical operations leading to fines and abatement costs
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence