Quality Assurance and Testing Process Inadequacy
Definition
Many SMB development firms lack rigorous QA and testing processes, leading to quality issues and post-launch problems. The problem: (1) manual testing is labor-intensive and error-prone, especially for complex systems; (2) inadequate test coverage allows bugs to reach production; (3) regression testing not automated, causing new features to break existing functionality; (4) performance and load testing often skipped due to time/cost, causing production failures; (5) security testing and penetration testing typically absent or minimal; (6) quality issues discovered post-launch are expensive to fix and damage reputation. Pressure for faster delivery exacerbates problem by further reducing QA time allocation.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: $80,000 to $250,000
- Frequency: monthly
Why This Matters
Test automation frameworks and training, QA process consulting, continuous testing platforms, automated testing tools, performance testing services, security testing services, quality assurance outsourcing
Affected Stakeholders
VP of Engineering/CTO
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Data available with full access.
Current Workarounds
Data available with full access.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Critical Talent Shortage and Developer Retention
Rapid Technology Obsolescence and Skills Gap Management
Mounting Security and Compliance Liability Exposure
Cost-Benefit Pressure on Feature Prioritization and Delivery
Hyperscale Demand for Personalization Creates Delivery Complexity
Scalability Architecture and Future-Proofing Uncertainty
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence