🇺🇸United States

Operational rework and overhead from dynamic pricing errors and reissues

1 verified sources

Definition

Incorrect dynamic fares and miscalculated reissue prices create large back‑office workloads for recalculation, manual refunds, and settlement corrections. ATPCO estimates that incomplete or wrong order information in downstream systems leads to tens of millions in additional servicing costs for fare and reissue calculations annually.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: More than $30M per year in additional servicing and reissue calculation costs across the industry when dynamic offers scale without accurate order data[4]
  • Frequency: Daily
  • Root Cause: Dynamic fare and offer engines are not fully synchronized with ticketing, order and settlement systems, so fare/rules logic for reissues and changes is applied incorrectly and must be fixed manually[4].

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Airlines and Aviation.

Affected Stakeholders

Ticketing & Revenue Accounting, Customer Service / Call Center Agents, Revenue Integrity Teams, IT & Distribution Operations

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

$2M-5M annually in compliance corrections, audit remediation costs, and potential partner dispute settlements when pricing errors trigger codeshare SLA violations • $30,000,000 annually in additional servicing and reissue calculation costs across the industry; individual airline exposure estimated at $500,000-$5,000,000 depending on dynamic pricing volume • $30,000,000 annually in servicing costs; chargeback fees from payment processors; customer lifetime value loss

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

AR team manually extracts PNR data from interline settlement records; compares to airline's internal booking system; builds dispute case in email with spreadsheet; sends to codeshare partner for clarification; multiple negotiation cycles ensue; unresolved disputes written off quarterly • AR team receives bulk rebooking list; manual extraction of each PNR; email to Revenue Management for each price calculation; compilation of corrected amounts in spreadsheet; email back to corporate travel; manual invoice adjustment • Manual lookup of booking PNR; email to Revenue Management for price verification; manual refund calculation; email to customer confirming refund; reconciliation with payment processor

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Mispriced dynamic offers from incomplete / inaccurate fare data

Up to 2% of revenue in lost revenue opportunities (~$14B industry‑wide) plus ~$500M in misallocated settlement values and >$30M in reissue miscalculations annually across the industry[4]

Revenue leakage from manual and static pricing in group and negotiated segments

Industry studies cited indicate revenue leakage of 3%–9% of total revenue from pricing errors, underpricing and related leakages in manual pricing environments[2]

Revenue leakage from misapplied dynamic contracts and corporate rates

Noted as ‘cost leakage’ and ‘margin loss’ at scale for high‑volume travel programs; while exact airline‑only dollar figures are not published, analyses describe these as significant recurring losses in dynamic pricing operations[3].

Unnecessary GDS and distribution costs from poor revenue integrity in dynamic environments

Revenue integrity practitioners report that unmanaged leakage (including unnecessary booking costs) can reach several percentage points of revenue; specific quantified GDS waste in dynamic pricing contexts is not broken out but is described as material and recurring[1].

Refunds, compensation and rework from misapplied dynamic fares

Described as accumulating ‘cost leakage’ and penalties over time; although not broken out as a single number for airlines, this is flagged as a recurring, material impact in high‑volume travel operations using dynamic pricing[3].

Delayed settlement and cash realization from misallocated settlement values

Up to $500M annually industry‑wide in misallocated settlement values, which both create losses and complicate settlement timing and reconciliation processes[4]

Request Deep Analysis

🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence