🇺🇸United States

Inadequate cost visibility on demilitarization stockpile undermines strategic disposal and investment decisions

2 verified sources

Definition

By not properly estimating and reporting the disposal liability of the demilitarization stockpile, leadership lacked accurate data on the long‑term costs of asset disposal. This impairs decisions on budgeting, prioritization of demilitarization workloads, and investment in alternative technologies or reuse/recycling options.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: The DoD IG characterized the unreported disposal liability as a material misstatement on the FY2016 Army General Fund Balance Sheet, meaning the error was large enough to influence decisions of users of the financial statements.[1] Over time, such misstatements can result in misallocated hundreds of millions of dollars in operations, maintenance, and capital investment budgets across the demilitarization enterprise.[1][5]
  • Frequency: Annually (every financial reporting and planning cycle) and during each major program/budget review
  • Root Cause: The Army had not put in place an approved, evidence‑based methodology for estimating disposal costs, so the demilitarization stockpile’s true financial impact was opaque to senior decision makers and planners.[1] This limited their ability to compare options such as extended storage, reuse, recycling, alternative demilitarization technologies, or capacity expansion at depots and industrial facilities.[5]

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Armed Forces.

Affected Stakeholders

Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller), Senior acquisition and logistics leadership (ASA(ALT), PEO Ammunition), PD Demil strategy and planning staff, Army Materiel Command and Joint Munitions Command resource planners, DoD‑level programming and budgeting officials (e.g., OSD Comptroller)

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

$10-25M annually in potential overpayment for Allied demil services due to lack of cost benchmarking against DoD estimates • $10-25M in lost optimization opportunity as Reserve/Guard demil queues grow without prioritization; deferred maintenance and delayed demil cycles • $10-50M annual audit adjustments and restatements due to demil liability estimation errors; reputation damage from audit findings

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Budget Analyst working with Contracting Officers uses historical contract prices without updated cost-per-ton data reflecting actual stockpile composition • Budget Analysts use Department of Defense IG estimates ($2,890/ton average) applied to static inventory counts from prior year; manual recalculation via spreadsheet • Compliance Auditor manually reconciles demil stockpile inventory with disposal cost estimates provided by organic facilities and PD Demil; creates audit working papers in Excel

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Under‑recognized disposal liability distorts budgeting for demilitarization workload

The DoD IG found the disposal liability for a 471,767‑ton stockpile of Operating Materials & Supplies awaiting demilitarization was materially understated on the FY2016 Army General Fund financial statements (exact dollar understatement not disclosed, but characterized as material at Army‑wide scale).

Demilitarization costs exceed storage, creating structurally expensive disposal pipeline

The DoD IG reported that, as of September 30, 2016, 471,767 tons of OM&S awaited demilitarization and that the cost to demilitarize these assets exceeded the cost of storage, implying hundreds of millions of dollars in lifecycle disposal costs borne over time.[1] Public Army and National Academies overviews describe an ongoing annual demilitarization enterprise with dedicated depots, specialized equipment (e.g., deactivation furnaces, rotary kiln incinerators), and alternative technologies, all representing recurring operating expenditures.[1][5]

Improper Payments in Military Pay Processing

$Billions annually (DoD-wide improper payments)

Excess Medical Inventory and Buffer Stock in Military Treatment Facilities

Several million dollars per year across the DLA medical supply chain and Army medical treatment facilities due to over‑stock, obsolescence, and expiry (exact enterprise dollar figure not disclosed, but stock-keeping units were cut from ~1,600 to 1,100 to reduce carrying costs, indicating large recurring savings and corresponding prior losses).

Waste from Medical Product Expiry and Environmental Exposure in Deployed Supply Chains

Estimable at hundreds of thousands to low millions of dollars per year across large deployments due to expired or temperature‑compromised medicines that must be written off (NATO documents treat this as a recurring risk that must be mitigated with quality systems and controls).

Cost of Poor Quality from Substandard or Degraded Medical Products in Military Operations

Recurring losses in the hundreds of thousands of dollars per year across major operations due to product recalls, destruction of compromised stock, and duplicated treatment or diagnostic procedures (precise aggregate figures are not publicly broken out but are material enough to justify detailed quality management frameworks).

Request Deep Analysis

🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence