🇺🇸United States

Borrower frustration and churn due to complex and opaque application processes

4 verified sources

Definition

Borrowers frequently complain about confusing terms, repeated document requests, and poor communication during loan origination, causing them to abandon applications or switch to more user‑friendly competitors. This friction not only reduces funded volumes but also damages brand perception and cross‑sell potential.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Digital borrowing journeys can see abandonment rates of 30–70%; banks that improve experience often report double‑digit increases in conversion, implying millions in incremental annual revenue for mid‑size portfolios
  • Frequency: Daily, seen in call‑center complaints, NPS scores, and funnel‑drop analytics
  • Root Cause: Non‑intuitive forms, lack of real‑time status transparency, disjointed communication between channels, and legacy processes that force in‑person or paper steps even for digital applicants.

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Banking.

Affected Stakeholders

Customer experience and journey owners, Digital banking/product teams, Loan officers and relationship managers, Branch staff, Contact center agents

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

$1.5M+ from delayed commercial loan funding and churn • $10,000-$30,000 per abandoned seasonal application; missed planting/harvest cycle financing windows; portfolio losses • $10,000-$30,000 per abandoned seasonal deal (planting/harvest cycle missed)

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Ad-hoc communication via phone and shared spreadsheets for document tracking. • Advisor creates custom nonprofit checklists; uses email to explain 990 form requirements and fund accounting concepts; maintains separate spreadsheet tracking nonprofit-specific docs; calls CFO multiple times to clarify restricted fund language and mission impact; uses phone/email to shepherd through confusion • Advisor maintains custom municipal checklists; uses email chains with municipal finance officer, town council members, and procurement officers; manually tracks budget cycles and approval windows; creates parallel spreadsheet of municipal requirements; calls frequently to explain compliance requirements unfamiliar to municipal staff

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Regulatory penalties for discriminatory or unfair loan origination and underwriting

$25M–$500M+ per enforcement action, often with multi‑year monitoring and additional remediation costs

Origination fraud and misrepresentation driving credit losses and repurchases

Mortgage origination fraud alone estimated at ~$5.36B in 2023 originations; individual bank repurchase/settlement waves have run into the hundreds of millions to billions over misrepresented loans

Lost fee and interest income from abandoned and slow loan applications

Banks report that 30–70% of started digital loan applications are abandoned; for a mid‑size bank targeting $1B in annual new consumer loans at a 3% NIM and 1% fee income, losing even 10% of potential volume equates to ~$40M in lifetime revenue forgone per year’s cohort

Excess labor cost from highly manual, multi‑handoff origination processes

Mortgage origination cost per loan at many banks has exceeded $9,000–$11,000 in recent years; automation initiatives frequently report 15–40% reductions in fulfillment cost, implying thousands of dollars of avoidable expense per loan at scale

Bottlenecks in underwriting and documentation limiting origination throughput

Vendors and banks report 20–50% productivity lifts (loans per FTE) after modernizing LOS and workflow; if a mid‑size bank’s underwriters can only process 5 instead of 8 loans per day, the lost capacity can easily translate into tens of millions in annual foregone originations and associated income

Slow approval and funding delaying interest income and hurting competitiveness

In mortgage, application‑to‑close cycles of 30–60 days are common; institutions that cut cycle times by ~20–30% report materially improved pull‑through and reduced lock‑extension and hedge costs, worth hundreds of dollars per loan and millions annually at scale

Request Deep Analysis

🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence