Where there are problems, there are opportunities. Based on 15 documented Unfair Gaps:
Print-on-Demand Services and Technology Platforms
The massive waste from 20-25% returns, excess inventory carrying costs, and forecasting errors creates demand for solutions that eliminate upfront print commitments. Publishers want to shift risk while maintaining availability.
For: Technology founders and manufacturing entrepreneurs who can build low-cost, fast-turnaround printing with retailer integration
Multiple documented cases cite transition to print-on-demand as the solution to excess inventory and return problems; established POD services are growing
DRM and Digital Rights Management Consulting
For: Technology consultants and security specialists who understand both content protection and user experience design
Two documented gaps specifically around DRM—one for under-protection causing piracy, one for over-protection causing churn—indicate publishers cannot solve this internally
Royalty and Returns Accounting Software
Manual processing of returns, reserve adjustments, and royalty calculations consumes multiple FTEs in mid-size houses and creates contractual disputes. Publishers need automation to reduce labor costs and improve accuracy.
For: SaaS founders with accounting or publishing background who can build specialized financial systems
Vendors explicitly market automation solutions for this problem; documented operational bottlenecks from manual systems and author disputes over opaque reserves indicate unmet need
Demand Forecasting and Inventory Optimization Tools
Publishers routinely over-print or under-print because decision-makers rely on gross shipments rather than net-of-returns data. With 20-25% return rates, forecasts based on initial shipments are systematically wrong by that margin.
For: Data scientists and supply chain consultants who can build predictive models using actual sell-through data instead of shipment data
Multiple documented cases show print run sizing errors, excess inventory, and forecasting failures driven by poor visibility into true net sales
Anti-Piracy Monitoring and Content Protection Services
Publishers lose billions annually to piracy but lack capacity to continuously monitor pirate sites, issue takedowns, and track unauthorized distribution. This is a recurring operational burden they would outsource.
For: Digital forensics specialists and legal service providers who can systematically find and remove pirated content at scale
Industry reports cite piracy as top revenue drain with 10-20% of digital sales lost; documented cases show publishers struggle with protection across multiple platforms