Chronic shipping overspend from uncaught rating, accessorial, and fuel errors
Definition
Without robust audit, shippers routinely pay incorrect base rates, misclassified freight charges, inflated accessorials, and wrong fuel surcharges, which aggregate into material overspend. Freight audit providers report that comprehensive invoice audits commonly recover 5–8% of freight spend due to such errors, implying recurring cost overruns before auditing is applied.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: 5–8% of total freight spend per year in many networks
- Frequency: Daily
- Root Cause: Carrier tariffs and contracts are complex and frequently updated, while internal rating engines and AP teams may not have current rate tables or rules, causing invoices to be paid at list or wrong rates. Manual checks and sampling approaches miss many small discrepancies per shipment, allowing them to accumulate into large annual overruns.
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Freight and Package Transportation.
Affected Stakeholders
Transportation/Logistics Director, Procurement Manager (Transportation), Freight Audit Manager, Accounts Payable Manager, CFO
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$100,000–$600,000 annually (5–8% of typical manufacturing freight spend of $2M–$10M) in unrecovered overcharges, extended cash flow impact from post-audit dispute delays • $10K-$80K annual loss (5-8% of freight spend) • $200,000–$1,500,000 annually (5–8% of 3PL freight spend of $5M–$30M) in unrecovered overcharges passed through to customers, delayed cash collection from customers pending accurate freight cost allocation
Current Workarounds
Manual cross-referencing of shipment records with carrier invoices, email escalation to operations for investigation, customer service tickets reopened when billing discrepancies discovered post-invoice, phone calls to carriers to dispute • Manual Excel pivot tables cross-referencing invoices against scanned/PDFs of master contracts; WhatsApp/Email chains to operations requesting BOL/POD photos for disputed lines; Spreadsheet-based fuel surcharge tracking using outdated contract rates; Manual weight/dimension spot-checks; Memory-based rate recall; Ad-hoc calculator verification; Paper note systems for flagged discrepancies awaiting carrier response • Manual investigation of disputed invoices, email chains requesting carrier documentation, holding payments pending clarification, escalation to management when carrier disputes arise, Excel tracking of disputed claims
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Systemic overbilling and duplicate freight payments not billed back as recoveries
Identified overcharges never recovered from carriers (payment recovery crisis)
Guaranteed service and late-delivery refunds not claimed
International freight overcharges from currency and tax miscalculations
Escalating audit labor costs due to manual dispute and recovery handling
Service failures (damages, delays) not translated into credits or compensation
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence