🇺🇸United States

Extended Days in A/R from Denial-Driven Payment Delays

3 verified sources

Definition

Denied claims extend the time between service and payment because each denial adds weeks to the resolution cycle while appeals are prepared and processed. Industry guidance notes that when a claim is rejected, reimbursement is delayed by several weeks, increasing days in accounts receivable and straining cash flow.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: KMS Technology reports that when a claim is rejected, reimbursement is typically delayed by 21–45 days.[4] For hospitals with millions of dollars tied up in denied claims, these delays translate into substantial working-capital requirements and interest or opportunity costs, as well as higher risk of eventual write-off if denials are not resolved quickly.[4][6]
  • Frequency: Daily
  • Root Cause: Inefficient denial-handling workflows, lack of prioritization, and slow appeal preparation keep claims from being resubmitted promptly; appeals may go through multiple reviews before final payer decisions, creating systemic drag on cash collections.[4][6]

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Hospitals.

Affected Stakeholders

CFO and finance leadership, Revenue cycle director, Treasury and cash management teams, Denials and billing teams

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

$1.2M-$4.8M annually (ED represents 25-40% of hospital volume; 20-30% denial rate on $20M ED revenue = $4M-$6M denied; 21-45 day delay on 60% of that = $1.68M-$3.24M in working capital cost; plus 15-25% of low-value ED denials written off due to appeal effort cost) • $1.5M-$6M annually (Medicare/Medicaid denials 40-60% of denials; medical necessity subset is 30-40% of payer denials = $1.8M-$2.4M in high-stakes denials on $100M revenue; 21-45 day delay on 70% of these = $756K-$1.2M in working capital cost; plus opportunity to prevent 50% through better real-time CDI) • $150K-$600K annually (WC revenue $2M-$5M; 12-18% denial rate = $240K-$900K in denials; conservative 60% recovery assumption = $96K-$360K in budgeted bad debt; actual recovery may be 70-75%, leaving $24K-$90K in unnecessarily reserved cash)

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

A/R Manager manually tracks high-value denials on separate Excel workbook; escalates to hospital finance committee; uses manual clinical chart pulls to build appeal documentation; coordinates with medical records department via email • A/R team batches ED denials weekly; uses manual worklist of 50-300 denials; sends bulk appeal letters via standard template; limited tracking of individual claim status • A/R team maintains separate aging schedules for Medicare vs. Medicaid denials; uses phone calls to MACs/Medicaid agencies to check appeal status; stores appeal documents in shared network folders with manual naming conventions

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Lost Revenue from Unworked and Written-Off Denials

HFMA reports that about 85% of denials are preventable, and other industry research commonly cites that 3–5% of net patient revenue is at risk from denials that are not successfully recovered; for a $500M hospital this equates to roughly $15M–$25M per year in leakage attributable to denials and insufficient appeals.[9][2][6]

Permanent Revenue Loss from Missed Appeal and Timely-Filing Deadlines

Waystar notes that payers may allow only 90 days for an appeal on some claims and up to a year on others, and that failing to resolve denials within these windows results in lost reimbursement; in many hospitals, millions of dollars are written off annually due to aging denials that exceed these limits.[6][4]

Denied Claims from Prior Authorization and Eligibility Failures

Experian’s 2024 State of Claims report (cited by RevCycle) attributes 76% of denials to missing, incomplete, or inaccurate data such as eligibility and authorization details, implying that a large portion of denial-related revenue loss stems from these front-end failures.[2] A hospital case example from Adonis shows that fixing missing prior authorizations for certain procedures materially improved financial performance, indicating that prior-authorization denials were a recurring revenue leak before process changes.[3]

Excess Labor Costs from Rework and Manual Appeals

HFMA notes that 85% of denials are avoidable, implying that the substantial labor spent working them is largely preventable overhead.[9] Denial-management vendors emphasize that without automation, organizations must invest heavily in human resources for appeals; for a mid‑size hospital, it is common for dozens of FTEs to be dedicated to denial and appeals work, representing several million dollars per year in salary and benefits tied to avoidable rework.[5][6]

Rework and Lost Revenue from Coding and Documentation Errors

FinThrive identifies coding errors and documentation gaps as common causes of denials that directly affect reimbursement.[1] RevCycle, citing Experian’s 2024 State of Claims report, notes that 76% of denials are due to missing, incomplete, or inaccurate data, which includes documentation and coding errors.[2] This translates into recurring rework costs and lost revenue opportunities across virtually all hospital departments.

Productivity Loss from Manual Denial Work and Bottlenecks

Waystar notes that best practice is to resolve denials as soon as possible and to ensure denials are touched as few times as possible, implying that repeated handling of the same denials wastes staff capacity and delays revenue.[6] KMS Technology warns that without clear priorities and automated workflows, denial backlogs grow, leading to delayed payments and underutilization of staff for higher-value tasks.[4]

Request Deep Analysis

🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence