Revenue leakage from unposted and misposted daily charges across PMS, POS, and OTAs
Definition
Hotels routinely lose revenue when room, F&B, spa, and incidental charges are not correctly posted to guest folios during night audit, or when OTA payouts and payment deposits are not fully reconciled. Industry guidance explicitly warns that fragmented tools and manual reconciliation create untraceable gaps, mismatched folios, misposted payments, and unclosed balances that lead to built‑in revenue leakage if not caught nightly.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: $5,000–$20,000 per property per month in missed room/F&B/incidentals and OTA under-collections for a mid‑size hotel portfolio (estimate backed by vendors reporting multi‑property ROI in the hundreds of thousands annually when automating night audit and reconciliation)
- Frequency: Daily
- Root Cause: Disparate systems (PMS, multiple POS, OTA extranets, payment processors, spreadsheets) force manual data export and matching, so staff miss missing restaurant charges, incorrect room rates, unrecorded incidentals, unpaid invoices, and reservations without attached charges during night audit.[1][3][5] Manual processes make it difficult to cross‑reference folios with payment logs, OTA payouts, and bank feeds, so discrepancies are only noticed weeks later or never, turning month‑end close into a key revenue‑leakage enabler.[3]
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Hotels and Motels.
Affected Stakeholders
Night auditor, Front office manager, Revenue manager, Director of finance / financial controller, General manager
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$1,000–$2,500 per property monthly from missed member discounts, disputed credits, and manual rework • $1,000–$3,000 per property monthly from lost incidental charges and manual rework • $1,000–$3,000 per property monthly from undetected rate errors and manual rework
Current Workarounds
Concierge manually writes incidental charges on paper folio or notepads; passes note to Night Auditor verbally or via folded paper; Night Auditor manually enters into POS; no audit trail of posting attempt • Controller manually compiles group master bill from PMS, matches against consolidated F&B and incidental charges from spreadsheets maintained by Sales and Concierge, compares total against bank deposits, identifies variances, sends email chain for corrections, manually journals adjustments; process takes 4–8 hours per group and blocks month-end close by 1–3 days • Controller manually exports PMS folio totals, POS sales, OTA reports, and bank deposits into separate Excel sheets; matches line-by-line using pivot tables and VLOOKUP formulas; flags variances; sends email to operations teams for investigation; manually journals variances or adjustments; process takes 2–4 hours nightly
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Excess labor and overtime from manual night audit and reconciliation work
Billing errors discovered after checkout leading to refunds, adjustments, and disputes
Delayed cash application and prolonged AR cycles from weak daily reconciliation
Lost room revenue and operational capacity from inaccurate room status and no‑show handling in night audit
Regulatory and tax compliance risk from incomplete or inaccurate daily revenue reconciliation
Internal theft and fraud enabled by weak night audit controls and manual cash/charge reconciliation
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence